跳至主要内容

How we can save hydropower

                                       marketing@boland-hydroturbine.com
Hydropower is the world’s third largest source of electricity and provides around 70% of the world’s renewable energy. However, dams – the traditional way we’ve harvested energy from water – are not as sustainable as you might think, disrupting the ecosystems within and around rivers, reducing biodiversity, and messing with water quality. Now, researchers are trying to find a way to make hydropower more environmentally friendly.
“It’s only recently that people have started to realize that these dams fill up with sediment, that they are structurally unsound, some of them, and that something needs to be done with them,” says Carlos Garcia de Leaniz of Swansea University in Wales.
But the world needs energy, and compared to other forms of renewable energy, hydropower is both flexible and predictable. Dams can store surplus energy generated when the sun is shining and the wind is blowing, and, unlike solar and wind, hydropower is fairly consistent. “There is no surprise tomorrow what amount of water will be in the Rhone or in the Rhine rivers,” says Anton Schleiss, who until the end of 2018 was president of the International Commission on Large Dams.
That’s why, despite their downsides, for the past 20 years large dams have still been built across the world at a steady rate. According to Schleiss there are around 320 to 350 of them higher than 60m under construction at any one time. While some countries in Europe may be running out of places to build very large dams, others, such as those in the Balkans, are still building.
Roselend Dam, France
Huge dams can disrupt the ecosystems within and around rivers, reduce biodiversity and mess with water quality.
Fish-friendly dams
Though large dams can be tracked, there are currently no reliable estimates of smaller ones across rivers in Europe, says Garcia de Leaniz. He is co-ordinator of the Amber project which, with the help of citizen scientists who upload photos, intends to map river barriers across the continent. Once Amber has been able to identify priorities, dams that are no longer in use can be dismantled to restore the waterway to its previous state, and those that remain useful can be rehabilitated to provide hydropower in a more sustainable way.
That’s where the second part of the Amber project comes in. The plan is to use “adaptive management” to maximise the benefits of a dam, while paying attention to and minimising environmental impacts over time. This can be done, for example, by using turbines that are more efficient or fish friendly, or by lowering the height of dams. Electricity production can even be stopped at crucial times to help fish pass upstream.
When it comes to making hydropower fish-friendly, another European project FITHydro, co-ordinated by the Technical University of Munich, is also looking into which of these techniques work best in different scenarios. As well as helping fish, the wider local ecosystem can be taken into account when designing dams. “They can be built in a way that, for example, flat wetlands can be restored as a compensation measure, and in many projects this already done,” says Schleiss.
Garcia de Leaniz points to the Poutès Dam on the River Allier in France as a success story. The dam has been responsible for a dramatic decline in the local wild salmon population. But in recent years a compromise has been struck between energy company EDF, environmentalists, scientists and local government, which will see the height of the dam lowered and the size of its reservoir reduced. These and other adaptations should allow fish to begin to flourish again, and still allow the energy company to generate electricity. “I think it’s very important to realise that we need to strike those compromises in the future because we really still need dams,” he says.
Going with the flow
For those hoping to eschew dams altogether, there is another way to generate hydropower. Companies like Smart Hydro Power in Germany are pioneering new technologies to put turbines in rivers and streams in order to generate electricity without disrupting the flow of water. Similarly to turbines inside dams, kinetic energy from the water is converted into kinetic energy in the turbine, which drives a generator to make electricity. “We are just tapping this opportunity,” says Karl Kolmsee, CEO of the company.
Others hope turbines in the ocean harvesting tidal energy can contribute a significant amount of renewable energy in the future. EnFAIT, a European project led by Nova Innovation in Scotland, is hoping to show that tidal energy can be an “abundant, economically viable and predictable source of power”, says John Meagher, director of business development at Nova Innovation.
Theoretically, these less-invasive methods provide hydropower without the environmental repercussions of dams – although some have argued that they can still disrupt fragile ecosystems and should not be considered a “green panacea”.
Either way, these new technologies won’t be able to entirely wean us off dams any time soon. With hydropower such an important energy source worldwide, and the EU requirement that its member states get 20% of their electricity from renewable sources, dams, in one form or another, are here to stay.
But that doesn’t mean we can’t look after the environment, too, says Garcia de Leaniz: “It’s very important that the criteria that are used for building dams in the 21st century is not the criteria that was used for building dams a hundred years ago.”
Technologist

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Water Turbine Design for Small Scale Hydro Energy

                                                  https://www.boland-hydroturbine.com/ Selecting the Best Type of Water Turbine Design Selecting the best type of water turbine design for your particular situation often depends on the amount of head and flow rate that is available at your particular location and whether it is at the side of a river or stream, or the water is to be channelled or piped directly to your location. Other factors include whether you want an enclosed “reaction turbine design” such as the Francis turbine or an open “impulse turbine design”, such as the Pelton turbine as well as the speed of rotation of your proposed electrical generator. By analysing all of these factors together you can get some indication of what type of  Water Turbine Design  may work best for your particular situation. Knowing the difference between a Pelton and Francis turbine for example, will help make the choice easier. The following table gives a basic idea of which particul

Types of Hydropower Plants

                                                   There are three types of hydropower facilities: impoundment, diversion, and pumped storage. Some hydropower plants use dams and some do not. The images below show both types of hydropower plants. MPOUNDMENT The most common type of hydroelectric power plant is an impoundment facility. An impoundment facility, typically a large hydropower system, uses a dam to store river water in a reservoir. Water released from the reservoir flows through a turbine, spinning it, which in turn activates a generator to produce electricity. The water may be released either to meet changing electricity needs or to maintain a constant reservoir level.                                                www.boland-hydroturbine.com DIVERSION A diversion, sometimes called run-of-river, facility channels a portion of a river through a canal or penstock. It may not require the use of a dam. PUMPED STORAGE Another type of hydropower called pumped

Hydropower, the only solution for cheapest power generation

                                                 https://www.boland-hydroturbine.com/ Hydropower has the lowest life-cycle cost of any power generation technology. Hydropower is a potential life-saver for Pakistan. Yet its development has been hampered for decades. Hence, only 15 percent of Pakistan’s over 60,000MW hydropower potential has been developed in 70 years. Hydropower plants power generation can give a country economy a new path of progress. Despite initial costs and long gestation periods, hydropower plants have almost no fuel cost and have operational lives of over a century. New hydropwer plants generate electricity at Rs6-10 per unit compared to thermal power plants’ Rs15-25 per unit. All other power-generating technologies have up to 30 years of project life and need up to four times expensive plant replacements in foreign exchange. Wind and solar technologies are solely dependent on the weather. They can at best supplement but not replace hydropower which, amo